There in my mind that when Mr Jinnah as a marker of difference from the Hindus raised a Muslim identity, it was no doubt only a strategic claim. India's Muslims, Muslim-dominated areas where Jinnah debate boasts a new and different country but we have solid evidence that the future state to achieve an Islamic state can be imagined is up to the creation of. In fact, Ayesha Jalal (sole spokesman) is very easy to show that a union in which Muslims would have been happy for the future National Assembly parity instead of Jinnah.
However, it is no surprise that the very slogan that was necessary to raise a nationalist movement has now come to haunt us: the slogan has become reality. Nation, which has become the slogan of truth as this expression appears immediately after the formation of Pakistan, remember we were told that Pakistan and to create a constitution until 1956 was not confirmed: we are taught in high school was. But no one bothered to teach us that, other things you are writing and in addition to delay adoption of the Constitution is a battle between the Islamists, a strict Islamic state and those opposed to a purely Islamic accent to the nation wanted. This, or aporia, our very fiber of this type within the national pedigree to compete.
What kind of country we can reduce the media channels through their pulpits all different groups of clergy, stressing, and through his work published. Here is a possible sample:
A nation where women less than men • right.
• A nation that non-Muslims than Muslims in the lower right.
Feudal system in a country still thrive, as the strictures against it may be a •.
A nation in which justice is harsh and immediate •: without due process sometimes and sometimes thought-out by private individuals.
So, its true essence, the mullahs modernity, an eighth century to eliminate politics, retrieve and then as a recipe for our national future to want to accept. Legislative power of this vision, therefore, always an idealized past, the future strength as authentic enough to affect the current debate the new law may not exist.
A pure Islamic state to post your thoughts about any historical narratives that take forever to history without acknowledging the mullahs really is different: We know about it because it is written down. The fact that my approval for us to assume that if history is a record, it should be as long as a computer allows, temporal, spatial and personal biases and ideologies that it was written recorded. History, so unmotivated, and never raised the name of tradition uncritically seriously undermine future losses can offer.
You or a mullah or strange articulations of the nation that can not walk into another country without the other: by and large, Zia ul-Haq years, we fully accept the mullahs public sector. Somehow it seems that their answer to all your problems over religion. But more than religion does not really solve our problems. In fact, since we are a religious national and more intolerant, sexist, racist and chauvinistic society became foregrounding identity.
Of course, religion is not to be blamed for it. But the politicization of religion and militarism interpretations of certain aspects play an important role in this. In the public debate about the role of religion all over, the religious mullahs up as a system of justice. Yes, some laws of Islam are justice, but there is no love in our religion? And if there love mhuhabbah, is through how we come into the public domain does not shine.
Shahbaz Bhatti Salman Taseer and point in the recent killing of two important cases: two persons "Muslim" because he was murdered by a disastrous law, opposed any kind of blasphemy. What kind of a civil society for an act of popular justice be killed by private citizens as allowing public citizens? And that kind of killing is allowed, then why blasphemy law? Themselves and their own fellow human beings to accept that people judge why not just have the right to punish.
Sadly not the growth of private media, in any way, half-baked theories at the role of the clergy, the private media, in fact, provided the mullahs with a very large frame and big audience to spread their sarcasm capable of.
Tradition and religion of hatred in the name of a short-term stabilization can solve this problem. May be a good start, at least, some will pass hate speech laws can be: a law that any person or entity for any acts of violence against group rhetoric to stop. Can regulate speech in public domain at least, what the mullahs are saying in their mosques may affect, but at least they are there for your captive audience will be asked to.
Read on the whole, and most Pakistani religious leaders and scholars of public debate later, I, all because of the delicacy, that I a very positive state of Pakistan in their articulations can not say anything that may have found that a practical, pluralistic, and all those who call themselves as Pakistani nation-state.
http://www.asianborderlands.net/rickymart8
http://www.mndaily.com/user/27923
http://www.asianborderlands.net/danielvettori6
http://interlocals.net/?q=user/13664
http://www.shootandhook.com/user/906
http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/user/jdryder3
http://www.tjntiy.com/user/2266
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/users/jdryder3
http://www.mndaily.com/user/28160
http://interlocals.net/?q=user/13659
https://www.spreadthunderbird.com/users/sherangayle7
https://www.spreadthunderbird.com/users/jdryder3
http://www.tjntiy.com/user/2249
http://interlocals.net/?q=user/13838
http://wonyfm.com/user/714
http://www.ashleytisdale.com/users/rickymart8
http://www.nisenet.org/users/danielvettori6
http://www.shootandhook.com/user/907
Seeing Science Everywhere
11 years ago
